Jump to content

Jeffery Yang

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

About Jeffery Yang

  • Birthday 06/06/1989

Profile Information

  • Location
    Shenzhen, China
  • Rig
    SONY A7S

Contact Methods

  • Skype
    jeffery.yang-cvw
  1. Anyone has experience using it with directional antenna to lengthen the range?
  2. Photokina 2014 is a very successful exhibition. Wish to meet more friends Photokina(20 to 25 September 2016). The exhibition sent an final press report. Here is to share with the highlights from official: Jeffery Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6DonVtsgA6hGbrGd4d5Ow Google plus: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115568999535734913007
  3. It is an encoder and can be sold by modules. It will be great if it is applied to wireless HD video transmission. Hopefully will greatly low down the cost.
  4. Paralinx applies WHDI from Amimon, so it is less than 1ms latency. If they can work for 12ms, this is a great thing.
  5. Did anyone really tested it for latency in using? We know that some products marked very low latency. For H264, 40ms is a very tough technical threshold..
  6. For professional transmitters, if it can support all the functions in the following, I guess people will choose without hesitance: 1. Long distance and low latency or Zero latency. 2. PSF 3. DSF 3. Multicast 4. Possible for directional antenna 5. Possible for different battery types
  7. Thanks for clarifying that. Please understand I am kind of new here. Your advice is taken. There is no denying for everyone to play by rules. Sorry if any inconvenience caused.
  8. Based on current development, it is still very difficult to get such latency. This requires a huge investment. Our target is to walk into 30ms.
  9. This is new model for consumable electronics. Let me share with you professional model with SDI. For professional area, the requirement is surely different.
  10. WOW, this is hurting. You might be seeking more professional one (CVW300). It can suit your needs.
  11. Compared with wireless video transmission in professional areas, customers usually have more choices in consumable electronics area. Different products are based on different solutions: WHDI, WIFI , WIHD etc. WHDI is no latency while is the most costly. WIHD is still having a long way to go for wide applications. WIFI technology is with great promise as almost all smart devices are supporting this standard. It is currently moving to 5Ghz standards for applications. Here is my question, if for WIFI solution, 1080/60Hz, >50M transmission for consumable applications which can replace the current most popular solution, what cost are you willing to pay? https://plus.google.com/115568999535734913007/posts/B3eHrtcdnaK Jeffery
  12. You doubt seems reasonable. But as a company in video transmission. We really have no idea or any attention for CNN logo.
×
×
  • Create New...