Jump to content

The Great Transmitter Debacle 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Premium Members

Suggestion - Instead of shooting photos of the screen, you may try to get a hold of a Leader scope, like the 5750 or 5330, which can frame grab picture and/or waveform? That way you can fend off any "well online it looks like A is better than B, even if you say that B is better in person." Use a hardwired signal as reference on the same waveform. leader scopes *shouldn't* lie and should make your life easier for frame grabbing???

 

Second request - when you're done let us do the test again in times square :).....something like monitors by the TKTS booth, transmitters on a car driving away. Not entirely the most realistic circumstance, but we have our own unexplainable RF zombies in NY, and a moving transmitter faster than typical speed in RF hell should be pretty punishing if I'm not mistaken. If it works there in that situation I'd imagine it works nearly anywhere. The sheer amount of wireless mics from TV studios, wifi, and RF "noise" from signage... could be a wringer.

 

If there is an NY segment, I can volunteer my Camwave and my neighbor's Teradeck...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Premium Members

I plan to record the transmitter's video via Nanoflash and post results as video files. The stills reference was aimed at the monitor aspect of the Debacle, showing relative brightness and viewability, which of course frame grabs won't help with. I'm sure we could put a waveform on the signal to test noise floor but that seems too bloody scientific and nerdy. You east coast guys can do that one if you like.

 

FYI one of my earliest uses of the Camwave was running around NYC including Times Square--and it worked flawlessly (and then not long after, it failed in a really benign environment back here). Maybe the three story M&M store is responsible for soaking up all of the RF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Members

The el-cheapos include the Asus Wicast and the Brite-view AirsyncHD and HDelight. They are all consumer units based on the same chipset, with different antenna implementations. Opitek is repackaging the Asus Wicast with some semi-pro-style mountings and powering options. Interesting to see how all three fare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Premium Members

I have one of the Asus WiCast units to go on my Pilot. I'm willing to help if I can with the range test or whatever. I can tell you already that the latency is VERY low.

 

I ran around at NAB last month with Rich Grebs blackbird stabilizer with the asus transmitter on it. I could go several rows over from his booth with very few dropouts. My guess was at least 100' before it got unusable. Less than $200 for the set. Not inclulding power that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Members

As far as I saw, the Optitek version was an Asus WiCast with a custom made power cable, and a sticker with his logo on it. Not much repackaging, and a decent price bump. It should fare exactly the same as a WiCast, if that's being tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...