Jump to content

Arri 435ES - Arrimag 120 and 120s


Recommended Posts

Hello Marco,

 

Technically speaking you can use both with no problem. The difference is CG's movement during shooting due to film travel within mags. Normal mags are designed to be confortable on shoulder and give more clearance at the bottom part. Because of this, the bottom film spool is slightly behind of the top spool. On steadicam mags however the spools are exactly on top of each other which translates to a less of a static balance change during a shoot.

 

If you have the option of choosing between the two try to get the steadicam mags. Normal mags can get very problematic for steadicam on longer takes or high speed conditions.

 

PS: also know that i am very jealous of you. It’s been almost a year since i last heard the sweet sound of a film camera. 2 mounts ago we used an Arricam Lite as a prop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Members

Marco,

 

In addition to maintaining your balance as film rolls through the mag, 435 steadicam mags allow you to put the rig in conventional low-mode when coupled with the 435 100% video top. This combo makes for a very nicely weighted and balanced camera.

 

If you haven’t used the 435 before, know that it is 24V, and has a substantial power spike turning over, especially at high speeds. Good luck, and have a great shoot.

 

Brooks

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...