Kiril Valchanov Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 Hallo guys! What do you think of this 4:30 minute shot? I did it a few years ago ... no postproduction, no sound ... 100% untouched https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxWScbYlms 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Philip J. Martinez SOC Posted July 19, 2015 Premium Members Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 That is some fantastic operating!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Charles Papert Posted July 19, 2015 Premium Members Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 What I think is a more interesting question is: Kiril, what did YOU think of it? What are the parts you didn't like, were better on other takes, you would have done differently after the fact? And presumably if it's a few years old you've seen it in context of the finished piece--did you feel it worked, that the length of the shot was justified (very hard for anyone else to judge that, without sound design or experiencing it in context). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiril Valchanov Posted July 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 Thanks guys! (apologies, for my devastated english) Charles, thank you, for specifying, on the important issues. The story tells, about a woman, just made double murder with shotgun, in state of menyal disorder, searching for the source of obsessive, sound hallucination,( barking), connecting her, abstractly to the crime, in space (cheep hotel). The sound, leading her to the stears DOWN (some where are dogs, and her sin), through absurd characters, whose language she is not are already drunk, dancing end celebrating. She is Cold, Polite, Courtesy but also Friendly.I decided to emphasize and reinforce that mental contrast, framing actress as mathematical and geometrical imperative. literally drove teeth to her "soul" , ignoring completely, constantly tempting me, group shot compositions, and addit spoken.They ional narratives. We did this scene for one day. Two rehearsals - stop ang go .... Iphone rehearsals :)) The first two takes, were in practice normal rehearsal 3rd take - camera JAM... 4th and 5th, fully unlocked my intuition. In the 6th take, after the seventh shift of sweaty T-shirt :)))I managed to consolidate all involved, about my thesis. 7th started well, deadly precise, fluid and homogeneous in each element, each element in turn, corresponded in absolute unison with everyone else. The camera went on their way, as hot katana in butter. 20 meters before the finish...camera JAM again... I was crushed ... after 10 min. get back smiling to the camera, told a brief anecdote from which all rolling laughter, grab the steadicam and.... 8th takes!!! I shared with you Cheеrs! :)) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiril Valchanov Posted July 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 Hallo again! I forgot to mention that I published the video without sound with reason. Sound picture and especially music, act more strongly on the subconscious versus visual practices. I chose three separated, otherwise indivisible arts, to analyze each separately before they gather in cocktail; :) Yonderboi - Thousand Bells This is the refference music Успешен ден! Бъдете здрави! Kiril Valchanov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiril Valchanov Posted July 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 What I think is a more interesting question is: Kiril, what did YOU think of it? What are the parts you didn't like, were better on other takes, you would have done differently after the fact? And presumably if it's a few years old you've seen it in context of the finished piece--did you feel it worked, that the length of the shot was justified (very hard for anyone else to judge that, without sound design or experiencing it in context). What I think is a more interesting question is: Kiril, what did YOU think of it? What are the parts you didn't like, were better on other takes, you would have done differently after the fact? And presumably if it's a few years old you've seen it in context of the finished piece--did you feel it worked, that the length of the shot was justified (very hard for anyone else to judge that, without sound design or experiencing it in context). Thanks guys! (apologies, for my devastated english) Charles, thank you, for specifying, on the important issues. The story tells, about a woman, just made double murder with shotgun, in state of menyal disorder, searching for the source of obsessive, sound hallucination,( barking), connecting her, abstractly to the crime, in space (cheep hotel). The sound, leading her to the stears DOWN (some where are dogs, and her sin), through absurd characters, whose language she is not are already drunk, dancing end celebrating. She is Cold, Polite, Courtesy but also Friendly.I decided to emphasize and reinforce that mental contrast, framing actress as mathematical and geometrical imperative. literally drove teeth to her "soul" , ignoring completely, constantly tempting me, group shot compositions, and addit spoken.They ional narratives. We did this scene for one day. Two rehearsals - stop ang go .... Iphone rehearsals :)) The first two takes, were in practice normal rehearsal 3rd take - camera JAM... 4th and 5th, fully unlocked my intuition. In the 6th take, after the seventh shift of sweaty T-shirt :)))I managed to consolidate all involved, about my thesis. 7th started well, deadly precise, fluid and homogeneous in each element, each element in turn, corresponded in absolute unison with everyone else. The camera went on their way, as hot katana in butter. 20 meters before the finish...camera JAM again... I was crushed ... after 10 min. get back smiling to the camera, told a brief anecdote from which all rolling laughter, grab the steadicam and.... 8th takes!!! I shared with you Cheеrs! :)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Sanjay Sami Posted July 20, 2015 Premium Members Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 Very nice. Thanks for the explanation. It answers what I found to be unusual framing choices in a couple of instances. Very solid work. I enjoyed watching it even without sound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiril Valchanov Posted December 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2016 https://vimeo.com/171730478 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sipho Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 Awesome shot, love ur work Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Jake Iesu Posted November 28, 2017 Premium Members Report Share Posted November 28, 2017 Wowsers. Masterful Kiril. I can't fault it well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Chris Haarhoff Posted February 22, 2018 Premium Members Report Share Posted February 22, 2018 Hi Kiril, would love to look at the shot but it comes up as unavailable. Is there a fix for that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiril Valchanov Posted February 22, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2018 https://vimeo.com/171407460 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Wood Posted February 23, 2019 Report Share Posted February 23, 2019 The only clinkers that I saw were at 3:28 and 3:33, and both were so minor that if I hadn't been watching to see technique I wouldn't have noticed. I would call this a TEXTBOOK example of how to work. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.