Jeffery Yang

You can ask Mike, here

Anyone has experience using it with directional antenna to lengthen the range?

Photokina 2014 is a very successful exhibition.

Wish to meet more friends Photokina(20 to 25 September 2016). The exhibition sent an final press report.

Here is to share with the highlights from official:

Jeffery

Google plus: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115568999535734913007

Paralinx applies WHDI from Amimon, so it is less than 1ms latency. If they can work for 12ms, this is a great thing.

It is an encoder and can be sold by modules. It will be great if it is applied to wireless HD video transmission. Hopefully will greatly low down the cost.

I met with one of their sales reps. He had a device that tested latency. Their encoder tested at about 12 milliseconds (not quite at the 8 milliseconds that they advertise, but damn, 12 milliseconds is great!). We also tested an Arrow and a Tomahawk for comparison; they came in at 750 and 850 MICRO seconds, respectively.

Paralinx applies WHDI from Amimon, so it is less than 1ms latency. If they can work for 12ms, this is a great thing.

http://www.vitec.com/products/encoders/portable-encoders/product/show/MGW-Sprint/

Did anyone really tested it for latency in using? We know that some products marked very low latency. For H264, 40ms is a very tough technical threshold..

For professional transmitters, if it can support all the functions in the following, I guess people will choose without hesitance:

1. Long distance and low latency or Zero latency.

2. PSF

3. DSF

3. Multicast

4. Possible for directional antenna

5. Possible for different battery types

Jeffery, we are a forum of Professional Steadicam operators that use professional gear. Think you're barking up the wrong tree here. This isn't meant to be snobby, but our livelihood depends, in part, on our tools and we work in a very demanding field. If it does not work, neither do we. Nuff said.

 

Oh, wait… there is more. I moved this thread to the "Video Assist and Video Accessories" area cause that's where we discuss this stuff. Next time, please just take a moment and think about where your thread should go before you post in "General Discussion."

 

Thank you.

 

EDIT: Just saw your other thread on video transmitters (also in General Discussion) and deleted it. Redundant. I, too, think you're advertising something, but I'll let this thread continue for the moment since we have responses from known members.

Thanks for clarifying that. Please understand I am kind of new here. Your advice is taken. There is no denying for everyone to play by rules. Sorry if any inconvenience caused.

It will be nice once high-quality encoder systems get below 10ms. That's going to be the future of wireless.

Based on current development, it is still very difficult to get such latency. This requires a huge investment. Our target is to walk into 30ms.

I'm not trying to hurt anyone, I'm just saying that if a wireless device does not meet these requirements, I'm not willing to look into it for my next system. Wifi bands tend to get saturated by consumer devices so it is not an ideal solution four our needs. Wifi also usually implies a Codec involved usually H.264 which means two things. Delay and compression. I'm sure there is a market for these, but I'm not part of it.

This is new model for consumable electronics. Let me share with you professional model with SDI. For professional area, the requirement is surely different.

Zero. But I'm willing to pay thousands if you get a long distance reliable uncompressed zero delay system with SDI pass through in a box that is usable on set.

WOW, this is hurting. You might be seeking more professional one (CVW300). It can suit your needs.

Compared with wireless video transmission in professional areas, customers usually have more choices in consumable electronics area. Different products are based on different solutions: WHDI, WIFI , WIHD etc.

WHDI is no latency while is the most costly.

WIHD is still having a long way to go for wide applications.

WIFI technology is with great promise as almost all smart devices are supporting this standard. It is currently moving to 5Ghz standards for applications.

Here is my question, if for WIFI solution, 1080/60Hz, >50M transmission for consumable applications which can replace the current most popular solution, what cost are you willing to pay?

https://plus.google.com/115568999535734913007/posts/B3eHrtcdnaK

Jeffery

Call the police first!

Do you have CAR DVR?

vs lol.....even better if you turn one upside down!

You doubt seems reasonable. But as a company in video transmission. We really have no idea or any attention for CNN logo.

With that logo you are begging to not be taken seriously and ridiculed.

I do not understand your meaning.

copying ideas is what some people do, including logos...

 

????

You should start all your posts with: BREAKING NEWS!

Good idea!

IBC exhibition starts from Today!

HEHE

CVW：refers to Crystal Video Wireless

The IBC exhibition is just around the corner.

It is the most influential exhibition in Broadcasting & filming. We believe this is a golden opportunity for companies to show new products.

What new products are you expecting to see in the Fair for wireless HD video transmission?

CVW, from China is going to release new models for 300M long distance HD video transmission. The model is CVW300 (8980/3862).

Some new pictures are released:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/115568999535734913007/posts

Videos:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6DonVtsgA6hGbrGd4Wd5Ow

Welcome to share new models will appear at the Fair.

That is great!
IBC is the most professional exhibition for Broadcasting and Filming.

CVW will exhibit latest long distance video transmission system at the booth: