Matt Burton
-
Posts
466 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Matt Burton
-
-
https://vimeo.com/63357898 discus !
I've actually been developing a system like this recently however these guys definitely are on the ball.
The tech I was looking at was more based around aerial multirotor systems like this -
however its very similar.Obviously it still takes a good operator to get good content but this is definitely going to be a game changer.
-
I just herd about this sad news, be strong and my thoughts are with you Hugo.....
-
-
One thing you can bet on is if it's that big now it will be the size of a packet of fags in 5 years time :o
-
They also sell "steadicam" systems hhhmmm :blink:
-
hi matt
i have 2,
modified efp/pro
xcs ultimate 2
regards
2 rigs, twice the fun ehy :D
Can you post any pictures of your current low mode setup ?
Normally with LCD rigs extra weight has to be placed on the bottom stage to counter balance the camera being below. However with a CRT I would imagine you have plenty of weight up top depending on what camera weight your carrying.
-
What steadicam rig are you using ?
Yes generally you should aim for normal drop times and setup time shouldn't be an issue when you have the correct method in place.
10 mins to change over really shouldn't be an issue if it's well rehearsed
-
Hi Nick
I don't think you realise how insulting that video is to a new operator, yes it's funny to experienced ops but in the context you have put it in it's just not cool.
I've spent quite a bit of time with Rory he's a massively talented guy and one of the most natural operators I've ever come across.
When I was starting out many years ago this place was an invaluable source of information and i'd hope this is still the case.
The problem is I should have explained how this forum differs from the average internet forum when I suggested he should join up.
Lars-Erick hope you are well :)
I believe Rory is still operating without a monitor and thus may explain the unwanted movement in the frame. The stock x22 monitor is almost useless with the 5D and I believe a marshal is on the way.
Also i'm not sure what weights are being used for dynamic balance at the moment to substitute the monitor weight etc (I'm guessing its all pretty make shift at the moment).
Taken all this into account I was pretty surprised how good the shot is and can't wait to see what you come up with in the future.
It's always nice to introduce somebody into steadicam and see them get hooked just like we all did :o)
-
I can think of a few jobs I had to turn down back in the day when I had my flyer as it just couldn't deal with the weight of pro level cameras.
I think when your starting out as an operator it's important to make a good impression with each and every client you get. Turning down jobs is never a good look !
-
Of course it helps if you have a good teacher Rory ;)
I have to admit the glidecam fits a hole in affordable starter rigs that can fly heavy setups with ease and is almost as smooth as systems costing ten times the amount.
-
What is the price point ?
-
I agree totally what your saying actually Tom :D
I was rather badly making trying to make the point that at 900 fps + you need to be traveling rather fast to get any noticeable tracking movement into the image.
It's sometimes easier or more practical to hand hold/dolly the camera around.
Saying that as you mention steadicam is the perfect tool for vehicle mount high speed work where vibrations need canceling out. I'd love to do some more steadicam slomo in the future and it's looking likely i'll get plenty of opportunity to do this.
I took a couple of years out of steadicam work to further my skillset, I was faced with an incredibly difficult decision and it's all worked out for the best (to cut a long story short). I will probably writing about what i've been upto in the journal section as i'm returning to steadicam now with much anticipation, and I hope to see you all around soon :D
-
At 900FPS you wouldn't need a steadicam ?
-
I found this interesting article on Engadget, perhaps of interest to UK operators looking for some Segway action in the future.
-
I agree that above 500 fps or so it's not useful to use steadicam but at around 100-400 fps I've had some incredible shots. One of the best was on low mode tracking a dog running. You could see bit's of grit flying up from it's paws at the lens, they looked kinda like asteroids floating around in space. :rolleyes:
-
Fantastic info guys thanks for the input !
-Matt
-
Thanks guys,
I wasn't thinking of using it on steadicam but now you mention it :rolleyes:
Have you seen the Phantom Flash Packs you can get, perhaps a new development ?
FEATURESHD (1920x1080) and 2K (2048x1536) resolution, with 2048x2048 maximum resolution
Up to 1000 frames-per-second at 1080p, 1500 fps at 720p
Adjust frame rate in 1 fps increments
Shutter speeds as fast as two microseconds (1/500,000 second)
14-bit sensor depth (42-bit color)
11-stop dynamic range
Approximately ISO 640
35mm depth-of-field
Circular buffer recording or Run-Stop
Component video output to viewfinder
Video out: 4:2:2 HD-SDI (720p, 1080psf, 1080i ? all standard formats)
Up to 16GB in-camera memory
Hot-swappable flash memory packs (128, 256 and 512GB) ? Available Spring ?07
SMPTE timecode
Hand held user-interface to control camera settings
Weight: 9lb (4kg)
Compatible with 35mm accessories
PL-mount lens compatible
-
The Phantom is looking good
Anybody use this yet ?
-
I'm looking for information on high speed cameras as I need to spec one up asap.
Really I'm looking for the best bang for buck camera I can get hold of that will do speeds of 1000fps and over at a decent rez.
Has anybody got much experience with high speed cams and could share some advice with me.
Many thanks
-Matt 'friend to the animals' Burton
-
Hi Fabrizio,
just for budgeting what do you think a mk-v lite full sistem is gonna cost? and what about the modularity? wich piece will work on different system? starting v-25 and then mk-v? the artemis look very interesting also..
off course i'm gonna take a workshop, suggestion in europe? prices? (glidecam make a good deal, satchler and mk-v i don't know)
ciao
Gabriele
I would imagine the MK-V lite sled alone would cost around the same as a full v25 or flyer package. So if you add on the cost of a flyer arm + stand + vest + batteries/charger + monitor etc it's going to be expensive !
From what I know Tiffen and MK-V do workshops in the UK and Glidecam and Tiffen do workshops in the rest of europe but i'm not sure what countries. A quick email to the various companies would help you find out.
-Matt
-
It would probably have to be a reasonably heavy-duty lightstand, most are only rated to around 15 pounds, and aren't that sturdy with that much weight on them in my experience, but a heavy-duty one like the one I mentioned should work. You may want to sandbag it for safety, especially if spin balancing, but I'm not sure - I haven't used it with a fully built sled yet.
Yes sandbags are a good idea but you don't want to be putting them in a backpack ?
I still don't see whats wrong with the steadistand ?
Gongrats on getting the pilot by the way :)
-
I just ordered the new Steadicam Pilot which comes with everything but a stand. My camera fully loaded is only 9 lbs, the Pilot and arm are probably 10 lbs each?
I don't need the burley stands that the pros use but would like something well built. The Pilot collapses into a backpack and carry all the gear. Since I do not have a cart or an assistant, the goal is to find a stand that collapses easily and is light weight. The Steadicam Steadistand is a perfect perfect example of portability, but I am looking for something a bit more rugged
Your suggestions are appreciated.
The Tiffen SteadiSTAND would be fine for you, it handles the flyer more than adequately and you will be dealing with less weight than a typical flyer setup. I've never had a problem with the SteadiSTAND and I'm pretty sure the only thing more rugged is a pro stand thats gona be way to heavy for a backpack surely ?
-Matt
-
Mpeg Streamclip is a great app to convert a DVD or VOB file.
And it's free !
-
I'm feeling a distinct lack of compassion around here suppose we better talk about i-phones :blink:
Interesting new rig
in General Discussion
Posted · Edited by Matt Burton
I've been researching similar tech for months all be it based around smaller cameras currently, see the link for a very prominent developer - http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1815204.
Its super exciting stuff and even an open source version is being developed along side many other copies and variants - http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1829058
What this means is you could well see very reasonably priced systems in the future, I've been playing around designing a system initially for smaller DSLR type cameras that includes a 4th axis for vertical movement but as the tech progresses could easily be adapted to larger cams. Add a small thumb joystick to pan tilt and even roll allowing a single operator no problems with single user operation. The current systems suit very light gopro or small mirrorless cams like the EOS-M and NEX as they have to be balanced just like a normall steadicam, the motors just keep the axis level with as little force needing to be applied the better. As I say its early days as the main development is taking place for aerial vidoegraphy but the community is massive and thriving and its only a matter of time until things get much more advanced. I was going to post hear a few weeks ago to get feedback on my ideas hoever freefly have got the ball rolling very nicely in opening this up to the film community with a very nice workable system. The potential is awesome it really is !