Premium Members Kyle Fasanella Posted May 9, 2008 Premium Members Report Share Posted May 9, 2008 Ok my current plan is to purchase a Transmitter Gx-68D $299 http://www.rf-links.com/vs-gx68d.htm AND Martin M806 $399 receiver and http://www.rf-links.com/M806.htm AM I going wrong with this purchase? besides taking the Cheap route? Can I get these without an antenna and get clear video? Or is it crucial that I get an antenna? I love to hear any other advice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members RobVanGelder Posted May 10, 2008 Premium Members Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 I have the feeling that you don't know much about transmitters.... ;) Anyway, antenna's are vital for the function, a transmitter without (tuned) antenna will destroy itself because it cannot get rid of the generated power. and the antenna for the receiver is vital because it is the pickup-element and needs to be selected to the appropriate frequencies. High power in a transmitter is in general not as important as a good and sensitive antenna on the receiver. High power will give often more unwanted reflections and in general the distance between the 2 antenna's will not be very great, I think a 200 ft is max. for most shots i have no idea how these units work, but i have seen cheaper boxes that did the job, so i expect they are probably similar or better in performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Robert Starling SOC Posted May 10, 2008 Premium Members Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Hi Kyle, the RF -links stuff is okay and they stand behind it very well. I got my nine channel through Mike Wilder at Image Gear for $700 or so +/-. On the other hand, it did fail on me two times and they promptly replaced it two times; once even overnight before I sent the other one back. After the second failure I decided to step up to a CanaTrans. I had standing orders for about a year on two Modulus 4000's that never materialized so I bit that big fat CanaTrans bullet. The quality is obvious but I dare say the image quality is visibly much better than the RF-links. Now the Rf-links is my backup transmitter and currently it is out on loan somewhere around the world with Rob Vuona. If you're watching your funds, don't use video assist much or just starting out RF-links should be okay for now. You could buy a dozen for what the CanaTrans cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Members Erik Brul Posted May 10, 2008 Premium Members Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Ok my current plan is to purchase a Transmitter Gx-68D $299 I think you better ask again about that price.., the 'old' GX-68(H) are 1995 / 2495 us dollars so that mentioned price of 299 couldn't be possible ! I just received a email from Steve from RF, this just to ask about a PAL version. They mentioned the 'D' is not PAL, but the pdf file say's it is both PAL / NTSC... :blink: For that amount of money i would consider the Canatrans... Erik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.