Premium Members Sanjay Sami Posted May 9, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted May 9, 2014 I had a grip ask me once " how does your crane balance like that?" If you stop drinking Summer Shandy, the real Grips will stop being embarrassed to work with you. Problem solved ... You are welcome. Quote
Premium Members Lawrence Karman Posted May 10, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted May 10, 2014 Why do so many discussions on here wind up in name calling? And talk of who invented what and when and who has patents really should be discussed by the concerned parties and lawyers. Otherwise it's rather boring to read about here. 4 Quote
Sandro Galv Posted September 19, 2014 Report Posted September 19, 2014 Greg, any news about your auto horizon? Quote
Premium Members Andrew bainbridge Posted September 22, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted September 22, 2014 this sort of thing? http://cinescopophilia.com/porta-head-10-brushless-gimbal-prototype-on-a-steadicam-with-an-arri-alexa-camera/?utm_content=buffered4b4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer Quote
Premium Members RonBaldwin Posted September 22, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted September 22, 2014 I think he was referring to Greg Bubb's device a few pages back. Looked like a smaller, neater, all in one solution. Quote
Premium Members RobVanGelder Posted November 3, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 3, 2014 Though this may sounds like I want to show off, when I started with Steadicam in 1993-94, I was seriously trying to get something like this to work, based on a mini-worrall or such head. Obviously, with hardly any miniaturisation of electronics available I was thinking of a steel wire pulley system, similar to hand brakes on a bike. I made drawings of the contraptions but did not go on with it as I focused on other systems. I did however try something else: with one of the first miniature futaba RC gyros and made a battery cage that would shift opposite of the roll direction. It did not work properly of course, the movements were erratic and too late since the sensitivity of the gyro was too low. But it might be an idea to work with new electronics. Instead of trying to balance a all day different camera configuration, why not a smooth moving counterweight at the bottom of the sled? Just thinking out loud,again..... Quote
Mariano Costa Posted November 4, 2014 Report Posted November 4, 2014 (edited) But it might be an idea to work with new electronics. Instead of trying to balance a all day different camera configuration, why not a smooth moving counterweight at the bottom of the sled? Just thinking out loud,again..... you mean something like this? http://www.steadicam.com/steadicam_wagner_horizon_whm.html Edited November 4, 2014 by Mariano Costa Quote
Premium Members RobVanGelder Posted November 4, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 4, 2014 Ehh, almost, but not really. As I can read from the documentation it is only a very accurate display and sensor that measures the angle and it is up to the operator to control the actual roll. The big display will help with that. If this sensor is then coupled to a"weight in a box" that moves opposite to the roll level, you will get what I mean. This will work when the rig is in neutral balance, otherwise there will be a delayed reaction. Quote
Premium Members James Davis Posted November 4, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 4, 2014 I believe this is the link he was looking for http://www.steadicam.com/userimages/Steadicam_WXB-ss.pdf I've demoed a rig with a prototype of this device attached at the bottom, alongside decent operating technique it works incredibly well. Quote
Mariano Costa Posted November 4, 2014 Report Posted November 4, 2014 (edited) If this sensor is then coupled to a"weight in a box" that moves opposite to the roll level, you will get what I mean. This will work when the rig is in neutral balance, otherwise there will be a delayed reaction. But it is exactely this. There are two systems, one is "just" a very precise horizon, the second is a horizon coupled with a servo driven weight which counteracts to the sled`s roll. This: http://www.steadicam.com/userimages/Steadicam_WXB-ss.pdf Oops, sorry James, saw your post too late ;-) Edited November 4, 2014 by Mariano Costa Quote
Premium Members RobVanGelder Posted November 5, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 5, 2014 Oh, I did not read that anywhere, though I noticed the high weight of on of the boxes. Then I think this is what I had in mind, but could not complete at that time due to inefficient level and gyro technology and too coarse servo drives. I made my system on the 3A that I had at that time. I still use a led level display that I made at the same time (1994) with the original electronic level in the J-box from the 3a. Ah, memories..... Quote
Abad Rosa Posted November 19, 2014 Author Report Posted November 19, 2014 I put a Ronin on top of my rig. Should I expect a call from a patent attorney? Quote
Premium Members RonBaldwin Posted November 19, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 19, 2014 Nope...just giggles from people realizing that you are still beating the dead horse. Quote
Premium Members BJMcDonnell SOC Posted November 20, 2014 Premium Members Report Posted November 20, 2014 Lisigav on the screws and on your junk should make things smooth. Miss you Ron. Been too long. Love your posts lol. Quote
Abad Rosa Posted November 20, 2014 Author Report Posted November 20, 2014 Just wanted to make sure it was dead and that I killed it. 2 things I learned from this thread: The tiffen patent on the "Lynn Axis" is worthless I'm an idiot Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.